In specific countries Public–private partnership

1 in specific countries

1.1 australia
1.2 canada
1.3 china
1.4 india
1.5 japan
1.6 philippines
1.7 puerto rico
1.8 russia
1.9 united kingdom
1.10 united states

in specific countries
australia

a number of australian state governments have adopted systematic programmes based on pfi. first, , model others, partnerships victoria.

canada

the federal conservative government under stephen harper in canada solidified commitment p3s creation of crown corporation, p3 canada inc., in 2009. canadian vanguards p3s have been provincial organizations, supported canadian council public–private partnerships established in 1993 (a member-sponsored organization representatives both public , private sectors). proponent of concept of p3s, council conducts research, publishes findings, facilitates forums discussion , sponsors annual conference on relevant topics, both domestic , international. each year council celebrates successful public–private partnerships through national awards program held concurrently annual conference in november.

at lower levels of government p3s have been used build major infrastructure projects transit systems, such viva rapid transit , ontario highway 407, , build public buildings such schools.

china

the municipal government of shantou, china signed 50-billion rmb ppp agreement citic group develop massive residential project spanning area of 168 square kilometers, locating on southern district of city s central business district. project includes real estate development, infrastructure construction including cross-harbor tunnel, , industry developments. project, named shantou coastal new town, aims high-end cultural, leisure, business hub of east guangdong area.

india

the government of india defines p3 partnership between public sector entity (sponsoring authority) , private sector entity (a legal entity in 51% or more of equity private partner/s) creation and/or management of infrastructure public purpose specified period of time (concession period) on commercial terms , in private partner has been procured through transparent , open procurement system.

the union government has estimated investment of $320 billion in infrastructure in 10th plan. major infrastructure development projects in indian state of maharashtra (more 50%) based on p3 model. in 2000s, other states such karnataka, madhya pradesh, gujarat , tamil nadu adopted model. sector-wise, road projects account 53.4% of total projects in numbers, , 46% in terms of value. ports come in second place , account 8% of total projects (21% of total value). other sectors including power, irrigation, telecommunication, water supply , airports, have gained momentum through p3 model. of 2011, these sectors expected investment of rs. 2,027,169 crore (according 2006–2007 wpi).

japan

in japan since 1980s, third sector (第三セクター, daisan sekutā) refers joint corporations invested in both public , private sectors.

in rail transport terms, third-sector railway line short line or network of lines operated small operating company jointly owned prefectural/municipal government , smaller private interests. third-sector lines former jr group – or, before 1987, japanese national railways (jnr) – lines have been divested larger companies.

philippines

the philippine government (filipino pag tutulungan ng pampubliko - @ pribadong sektor ) maintains online list of ppp projects. wikipedia articles on specific ppp projects in philippines categorized category:proposed infrastructure in philippines.

the philippine bot law has been passed on may 5, 1994 , had been subsequently amended in 2012

puerto rico

wikipedia articles on specific ppp projects in puerto rico categorized category:public–private partnerships in puerto rico.

russia

nowadays there special laws ppp in 69 subjects of russian federation. biggest part of them declarations. besides ppp in russia regulated federal law #115-fz (21.07.2005) on concessional agreements , federal law #94-fz (21.07.2005) on procurement of goods, works , services state , municipal needs . in ways ppp regulated federal law №116-fz (22.07.2005) on special economic zones (in terms of providing business benefits on special territories – in broadest sense variation of ppp).

still laws , documents not cover possible ppp forms.

in february 2013 experts rated subjects of russian federation according preparedness implementing projects via public–private partnership. developed region saint petersburg (with rating 7.8), least chukotka (rating 0.0).

by 2013 there 300 public–private partnership projects in russia.

united kingdom

in 1992, conservative government of john major in uk introduced pfi, first systematic programme aimed @ encouraging public–private partnerships. 1992 programme focused on reducing public sector borrowing requirement, although, noted, effect on public accounts largely illusory. labour government of tony blair, elected in 1997, expanded pfi initiative sought shift emphasis achievement of value money, through appropriate allocation of risk. however, has since been found many programs ran dramatically on budget , have not presented value money taxpayer, projects costing more cancel complete.

united states

the west coast infrastructure exchange (wcx), state/provincial government-level partnership between california, oregon, washington, , british columbia launched in 2012, conducts business case evaluations selected infrastructure projects , connects private investment public infrastructure opportunities. platform aims replace traditional approaches infrastructure financing , development performance-based infrastructure marked projects funded possible internal rates of return, opposed tax dollars, , evaluated according life-cycle social, ecological , economic impacts, opposed capacity addition , capital cost. brother s keeper challenge example of public–private partnership.

in 2017, state of texas sought first ever private partner join in project renovate g. j. sutton building in downtown san antonio near alamodome, according mike novak, chairman of texas facilities commission. local governments in texas have entered such partnerships including redevelopment of hemisfair arena , construction weston urban of new frost bank tower in san antonio. named g. j. sutton, first african-american elected official in san antonio, six-acre complex vacated state in 2014 because of bat infestation , deteriorating foundation. in 2015, governor greg abbott, counter wishes of mayor ivy taylor, used line-item veto remove $132 million have funded rehabilitation of sutton. state expects see property used @ point in future office space , parking slots.

billy nungesser, lieutenant governor of louisiana, proposed in 2017 public–private partnerships established many of state s financially-strapped state parks, fall under jurisdiction, particularly citing 2 popular facilities in sabine parish: north toledo bend state park , hodges gardens state park, @ operating costs vastly outstrip revenues $1 park admission fees. because of recurring state financial issues, fate of state parks in louisiana remain in doubt after july 1, 2017.

in massachusetts, arrangements allow state department of conservation , recreation pave on gravel utility roads under high-voltage transmission lines operated utilities have been branded baker administration , eversource energy public-private partnerships create alternative transportation corridors. particular arrangement involves no financial risk for-profit utility. utility has existing easements, share right-of-way. utility not have existing easement wishes gain state approval constructing new transmission lines on state property, utility reproduces designs of rail trails in petition state energy facilities siting board (efsb). approval enable utility have construction of transmission lines , gravel utility paths funded through electric ratepayer bills. piggybacking onto electric reliability project leverages rights of for-profit public utility overcome environmental , zoning bylaws rail trail might otherwise subject to. legality of steering greenfield transmission projects environmentally sensitive conservation , wetlands, , using electric ratepayer funds non-reliability purposes being tested. in related case, massachusetts supreme judicial court ruled electricity customers can no longer asked cover costs of building gas pipelines.